價錢平 2012Oct入行約HK$54xx
支鏡輕 方便
色水靚
顯示： 13 - 18 (最新發表)
優點:
紅圈入面係平
靚仔
輕
焦段實用
靚仔
輕
焦段實用
缺點:
17mm 變形
評價:
無論apsc 定ff , 17-40都係好常用,好好用的焦段
呢支係好物來..
現在我長插 機身做天涯鏡
當然 唔好話影景收光圈就唔駛大
其實我用既時候成日想景深淺的./....
4光圈係細左的....
不過大致上呢個價係唔錯
呢支係好物來..
現在我長插 機身做天涯鏡
當然 唔好話影景收光圈就唔駛大
其實我用既時候成日想景深淺的./....
4光圈係細左的....
不過大致上呢個價係唔錯
優點:
- 個range 實用(ff)
- 相對平
- 防塵
- 手感十分好
- 紅圈血統， 靜，快
- 輕
- 相對平
- 防塵
- 手感十分好
- 紅圈血統， 靜，快
- 輕
缺點:
- 個hood又大又肉酸
- 光圈全開有少少黑角 但可接受
- 既然wide開， 俾埋16mm 仲好啦
-色農
- 光圈全開有少少黑角 但可接受
- 既然wide開， 俾埋16mm 仲好啦
-色農
評價:
感覺十分好。本人好鍾意影廣角相。以前用600d，配tokina 116， 心諗tokina在apsc中享負盛名，屬頂級之選，反而17-40只是16-35的次級，上左ff後未必有同樣感覺。其實當初買呢支鏡之前十分唔捨得支tokina.“格硬“用佢16mm果段用係5diii度， 後來頂唔順d黑角買左支17-40。兩者相比下17-40色彩更出， 變型亦更少。 但成像都係tokina 好dd.
好多ching話支鏡用係apsc好用。我就麻麻地。因為支鏡最大功用左放於廣角用來做標準有d埋末左支鏡。 如果想用aspc用紅圈，我會揀24-105。
在ff中佢嘅17-24用來影wide25-40影standard. 旅行影景可能大部分時間鏡都唔洗換鏡。
至於光圈。影wide又要大光圈的情況不多。上左ff iso通常勁左可補助吓室內光線不足的情況。
好多ching話支鏡用係apsc好用。我就麻麻地。因為支鏡最大功用左放於廣角用來做標準有d埋末左支鏡。 如果想用aspc用紅圈，我會揀24-105。
在ff中佢嘅17-24用來影wide25-40影standard. 旅行影景可能大部分時間鏡都唔洗換鏡。
至於光圈。影wide又要大光圈的情況不多。上左ff iso通常勁左可補助吓室內光線不足的情況。
優點:
性價比高
用料紮實
內變焦,內對焦 (唔易入塵)
輕
對焦快(USM good)
色澤鮮明
昡光、鬼影、色散、變形、暗角控制良好
影景sharp
用料紮實
內變焦,內對焦 (唔易入塵)
輕
對焦快(USM good)
色澤鮮明
昡光、鬼影、色散、變形、暗角控制良好
影景sharp
缺點:
f4(唔夠大)
無IS
室內和夜景稍為暗
無IS
室內和夜景稍為暗
評價:
雖然呢枝鏡唔夠16-35光圈大,但係勝在價格合理,影出呢D野同16-35差唔多,而且我之前也打算買17-50(sigma)但最後揀17-40,因為始終用原廠鏡比較好D and 影D野硬係好少少,同埋用係FF機幾wide 同sharp所以揀17-40,
但係無N記16-35mm咁體貼用家,因為16-35mm提供4級防震在室內和夜景稍為優勝
不過其實已經好好,只係有少少美中不足的地方!
希望幫到大家 thx!
但係無N記16-35mm咁體貼用家,因為16-35mm提供4級防震在室內和夜景稍為優勝
不過其實已經好好,只係有少少美中不足的地方!
希望幫到大家 thx!
最後更新：2012-07-23 13:12:03
優點:
顏色夠sharp, 對焦夠快, 加上輕便同唔變形, 以上四點係我最基本要求, 但亦係最重要.
現在7D常用鏡係17-40, 24-105已成後備 >.<
現在7D常用鏡係17-40, 24-105已成後備 >.<
缺點:
勉強要講就係焦距, tele到50mm就perfect (不過17-50的話又同另一枝F2.8相同)
同埋賣平D, 哈哈
同埋賣平D, 哈哈
評價:
Body用7D, 配17-40好用
用過10-22; 15-85 同 17-40, 有以下感想:
10-22: 顏色同對焦OK, 但太wide易變形, 影相時成日諗焦距就好唔方便
15-85: 顏色差, 唔sharp兼灰灰地, 15-17mm時變形勁過變形金剛, 除了焦距好用外, 諗唔到有咩優點
17-40: 睇返上面"優點"
用過10-22; 15-85 同 17-40, 有以下感想:
10-22: 顏色同對焦OK, 但太wide易變形, 影相時成日諗焦距就好唔方便
15-85: 顏色差, 唔sharp兼灰灰地, 15-17mm時變形勁過變形金剛, 除了焦距好用外, 諗唔到有咩優點
17-40: 睇返上面"優點"
最後更新：2012-05-27 09:06:39
優點:
Inexpensive 'L' lens
Sharp at F4
Even sharper at F5.6
Good zoom range for 1.3/FF
No IS
Sharp at F4
Even sharper at F5.6
Good zoom range for 1.3/FF
No IS
缺點:
Original Lens hood is very wide (ugly)
Distortion at corners
Distortion at corners
評價:
If you have FF/1.3x, this is the best C/P 'L' lens. (1.6x may consider 10-22mm) At this price point, what more can you ask for? The construction is very sturdy, yet it is not heavy to use all day long. I have a 1.3x and this lens becomes my standard zoom lens. (22-60mm). The color, sharpness is outstanding even at F4. From F5.6 upwards, it is comparable to prime lenses. Focus is very fast and accurate.
Without IS, this lens can still preform indoor/low light by 1)upping the ISO, 2)using flash, 3) monopod/tripod, or 4) steady hands.
I put no IS as a '優點' is because canon can charge us less $. If this lens comes with IS, it will prob cost close to $10k. At this zoom range IS is not quite necessary.
For ultra low light, you need prime lens anyway.
For my 1.3x, I bought a EW83J (77mm lens hood for efs17-55) and there is no dark corners, and I can put this lens hood in my camera bag.
Without IS, this lens can still preform indoor/low light by 1)upping the ISO, 2)using flash, 3) monopod/tripod, or 4) steady hands.
I put no IS as a '優點' is because canon can charge us less $. If this lens comes with IS, it will prob cost close to $10k. At this zoom range IS is not quite necessary.
For ultra low light, you need prime lens anyway.
For my 1.3x, I bought a EW83J (77mm lens hood for efs17-55) and there is no dark corners, and I can put this lens hood in my camera bag.
