Leica Q [Typ 116]

評測報告

實拍照片

- light! Lighter then my M-P with any Summilux lens
- autofocus comparable speed and accuracy to Sony A7 series or Olympus E-M5
- 28mm best for street photograph and snapshot! Actually same as iPhone!
- 28mm perfect for selfie even without flip screen
- first real Leica quality camera with Wifi remote & file transfer
- software design better then Leica M
- love the macro
- battery life is good one day 1 battery
- digital zoom to 35mm still have decent MP (same as A7s) 50mm questionable
- cheap compare to Leica M + 28mm f2.0 or 35 f1.4

- a bit too small for bigger hand
- maybe 35mm for serious photographer? But I can understand why 28mm is a good pick for iPhone photographer & selfie
- optically is still not true Leica M with Leica M Lens (is the closest optically quality I have ever seen)

I own Sony RX100-3, Sony A77, Sony A7, A7S, Olmypus E-M5, Leica M 240P with Tri-Elmar 16-21, 35mm Summilux, 50mm Noctilux, 50mm APO Summicron& 90mm Summicron. I have tried Lots of friends' camera: Canon 5D3, RX1r, Panasonic GF and etc.

Do u need Leica quality and can afford it? yes continue.
If following questions more then 2 are YES then get Leica M
1. I absolutely need multi-Lens?
2. You can shot perfectly fine with manual focus EVERY shot
3. I want highest quality optic and color rendering and will not settle any one bit less

If You only have 1 yes on above and care about the following more then the above:

1. I need to selfie
2. I need WIFI
3. I need autofocus
4. I need Marco
5. I like to travel light
If you have more then 2 yes above get Q...

So simple... If u will pay 25k or more there are only Q left... Then is Leica M system.

見下文

見下文

好不容易終於買到Q, 想同大家分享下, 主要係從用過X 113既用家角度去比較X 同Q 唔同方面既心得

Background: 本人用過既大sensor DC有 Sony RX1, RX1r, Ricoh GR, Nikon Coolpix A, Fuji X100s, Leica X 113, 全部已賣, 用得最耐既係RX1同GR (也是最愛用既兩部機), 本身都好中意X, 但賣X既原因係因為出左Q

機身感覺

Q一拎上手第一感覺就係重, 重過X, 明顯地重過, 但冇M咁重, 有小小似M6係手既感覺. 但體積唔係差太遠, Q大小許. 蒙皮唔同X, 我覺得質感好左
機身所有按鈕同轉盤都比X紮實, 不過紮實既程度有冇值三倍價錢呢, 唔同人可能有唔同感覺, 對我來說我覺得值. 特別要提下通常人容易忽略既快門制(對我來說很重要), Q既快門制大粒過X, 回饋感好得多, 唔會有X個D鬆鬆既感覺, 而且係黑色, 相比起X冇咁易花.
機背既轉盤我比較喜歡X個種, 但Q應該用耐D就會習慣

MF對焦環

同X一樣, 對焦環都係轉最盡轉AF, 但Q多左focus tab, 呢點係似番m鏡既對焦感, 不過對焦力度太緊, 令我寧願用對焦環都唔用focus tab, 但就引伸左另一個問題, 因為之前用X既話如果MF轉AF直接轉到最盡就得, 但Q有粒AF MF lock制係focus tab下面, 所以令到我本身唔用focus tab既人, 次次想轉AF MF都要搵粒制unlock, 有點影響攝影既流暢度. 個人覺得用番X既轉最盡係AF方式已經足夠

光圈焦距

冇錯好多人話Q唔係35mm, 比28mm冇咁好, 但大家唔好忘記X都係一支23mm鏡裁剪後既35mm, 其實Q digital zoom後既35mm, 散景同焦距效果係一支28mm鏡裁剪後既35mm, 會比X用23mm鏡裁剪後既35mm好, 兩者都係1.7summilux, 但Q一米內唔會自動縮光圈, 仍然係1.7, 所以在裁剪後既35mm前題下相比, bokeh係Q優勝過X好多.
我以上只係Q同X既相比, 當然, 如果你需要真正既full frame 35mm, 現有既選擇只有sony RX1.

ISO & picture quality

唔洗問高ISO當然係Full frame既Q好好多, 應該大約好兩級.不過個人最唔滿意X在紅色中既表現, Q都係一樣, 一遇到鮮紅就爆晒色, RAW都救唔番, 我諗用過X既朋友會明我講咩.
Q支鏡真係好sharp, sharp過X, 但客觀黎講, 都係差sony RX1 小許.

EVF同Touch LCD

EVF 反應比X用既visoflex好好多, 冇延遲感, 最緊要既係同LCD既色溫一樣.
Touch LCD shutter 好快, 雖然冇AB比較過, 但應該唔會同M4/3既無反或Canon 70D etc差好遠, 絕對可用, 彌補左Q冇tilt LCD既不足.

Conclusion:

X 做到既野, Q所有都做到, 除左以下三樣:
- 重量
- Q經裁剪後既35mm比X低左像數
- 價錢, Q係X既三倍

本人覺得Q既價錢唔係平, 但咁既價有EVF, 28mm summilux, 防震, improved AF speed & AF accuracy, touch screen, 最重要最重要最重要既係FULL FRAME. 要諗下, M mount 既28mm summilux 1.4剩鏡都已經US$6644, 而家Q 係US$4250 我認為合理

如果不介意價錢, 我誠意推薦大家upgrade上Q

Summilux 28mm/ 1.7大光圈鏡頭
Maestro II 處理器, 與Leica S 007 一樣
金屬機頂, 底
連電池640g, 輕巧
AF快速
光圈環, 快門轉盤
3680mp EVF
Video追焦暢順
金屬lens hood, 金屬鏡頭蓋可直接裝上
Touch screen,但我比較少用
OIS有效
Digital zoom: 28mm, 35mm. 50mm
Marco
Made in Germany

機身中央膠造, M機全金屬
鏡頭好似膠造, M鏡全金屬 (更正:Q是全金屬鏡身, 和M鏡一樣)
對焦環, 光圈環不是十分暢順, 對比M鏡的超順滑有分別

Leica進擊之作, 和我的M-P type 240 + Summicron 28比較更sharp, 映象更細節,對焦速度和Sony A7II一樣, 操控一流, 對想擁有Leica全片幅畫質但不想手動對焦的用家是最大吸引力, 現在不是70年代, 我每天對著電腦和手機8小時, 常常眼乾淚水不足,再手動對焦真的傷眼, 用Leica Q映相真是享受, 就算我有幾支M鏡我都甘講, 但當然拿在手上M機是工藝品, Q只是普通相機, 期望Leica可以出－部可AF的M, 像Contax AX可以在手動鏡AF, 這樣就完美啦