Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 G ED VR

評測報告

實拍照片

Nikon is doing a quite good job on this lens compare (in terms of money and quality) with the same one from Canon's 28-300 that I am using in my company,

I won't give to much challenge on such focal length lens and this is what is was made for user's convenience and efficiency.

Worth to get one if you are using FX camera, overall personal feeling and opinion to share here: sharpness and image quality between 50-200mm is best, 300mm is good, however in wide angle is quite disappointed.

Good company for tour trip,

Reasonable price
Reasobable size and weight
Sharp and Fast
With VRII
Standard 77mm filter for professional lens

Distortion is quite visible
May not be suitable for taking architectural building, walls, straight edges

This FF lens with above average PQ, Sharpness and Focus Speed (mounted on D3) can satisfy most semi-professional photographers. The price in the $7-8K range is quite reasonable for a N lens. Excellent for travel around uses.

方便,
300端影像出人意表
G鏡群中性價比超高(fx級數而言)

Hood比較鬆
易入塵
28mm變形明顯

以前用過18-200vr,相比之下28-300vr真的令人有驚喜,而且價格親民,對焦距離比70-300更近,老實說他真有機會取代70-300(當然價錢不同),天涯鏡方便程度不用多說,配16-35就可以輕鬆上路。只是重量接近24-70倒是一個考慮恩素,排除這方面我誠意推薦。

1.) FX機終于有原厰天涯鏡了，不要跟我說24-120 Nano是另外一支天涯鏡
2.) 出閑trip不用大三元咯！
3.) 加支24.4或14-24剛剛好！
4.) 同738VR都是沙瓦迪cup貨，不過就PQ好很多，也不像738VR支支有塵

1.) No Nano
2.) Zoom鏡筒分兩節，容易入塵
3.) 泰國製造
4.) 口徑小D更好，雖然我都有不少77mm B+W filters
5.) 同A20N II比，重50%
6.) 價格就見仁見智，到底沙瓦迪cup貨
7.) 落燈就要飛燈咯
8.) 遮光罩對tele段可以說係裝飾品

昨晚剛入貨，人有我有，幾十支鏡，支支要講理由唔係好唔得閑，初步覺得FX天涯鏡一支，同A20N II比，三個字：虛榮心，如果說重50%更有手感，77mm filter更霸氣，係阿Q精神，或者相的PQ是好些，但是問我差多少，我就莫宰羊了，不過D3X唔方配震騰騰咩，幾cheap吖！完全為face，我絕對係個勢利小人。

平、67xx行貨、二手放比人唔會太低價

·

太易入麈

夜景想用就死左條心啦，不過要求唔高就0K好用,依家唔買第日又加價就笨啦!

手功同質感都好過18-200
個lock 幾就手
價ok (18-200 一出都甘上下價位)
77 filter, 心理上開心d. cpl 唔使買過
防震幾有用
夠大支.. 上d3平衡感幾好

hood 好樣衰, 感覺上好怪
made in thailand
無 N

話明天涯鏡, PQ一定唔可以EXPECT太高, 但個RANGE夠方便. 去旅加支WIDE就夠晒.
等左甘耐終於有支FX天涯鏡, 我昨晚一炮過由CANON轉反NIKON 有好大因素係因為呢支, 同就快出果支 35 1.4.